Suffice it to say, it is impossible to be dogmatic about the identification of sons of God here. The best one can do is consider the options. While it may not be comforting to the reader, perhaps it is best to say that the evidence is ambiguous and therefore defies clear-cut identifications and solutions (Hamilton, ibid., p. 265).
Given the variety of ways in which the sons of the gods has been understood, it is hard to know which sense is correct-angelic, royal or traditional Sethite (Gordon Wenham, Genesis 1-15, Word, 1987, p. 140).
Although we commend the Sethites as the sons of God, no view escapes troubling criticism. The mysterious identity of the sons of God continues to humble the expositor (Matthews, ibid., p. 332).
Nevertheless, it is impossible to hold this or any other alternative view with any degree of certainty. It is necessary to conclude that there simply is not enough evidence to justify using this passage as a source of information about angels (Erickson, ibid. p. 443).
The Blue Letter Bible ministry and the BLB Institute hold to the historical, conservative Christian faith, which includes a firm belief in the inerrancy of Scripture. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a range of evangelical traditions, all of the ideas and principles conveyed in the resource materials are not necessarily affirmed, in total, by this ministry.
Loading
Loading
Interlinear |
Bibles |
Cross-Refs |
Commentaries |
Dictionaries |
Miscellaneous |